Measuring employee engagement
can be a challenging task since it’s an activity that requires evaluating of
human feelings and emotions (Robinson
et al., 2004). The most commonly used tool for measuring employee
engagement is an employee engagement survey. These surveys help gauge the
intensity of employee engagement as well as evaluate the relationships between
engagement and key business results. The findings from such surveys often
provide critical information on the effectiveness of HR practices of the
organization and provide insights on where changes are needed (Vance, 2006).
The surveys are usually conducted
online. The guarantee of anonymity is a very important aspect of the surveying
methodology – the employees will share their candid feedback only if they are
certain that the survey ensures anonymity. At my current organization, tools at
surverymonkey.com is used to send out the employee satisfaction surveys and the
responses are not tracked with complete anonymity guaranteed hence as an employee
I feel safe in sharing my honest opinion.
It is critical that an
employee engagement survey contains questions that would help capture the
essential data relating to the responder’s biographical characteristics
(gender, age, ethnicity to name a few) and other job-related characteristics
(such as department, length of service group, nature of employment). This
information is critical when it comes to the analysis of the responses and
coming up with strategies to increase employee engagement levels (Robinson et al., 2004). However, it
must be noted that these identifying questions should not break the anonymity
of the responder. For example, if the IT department of an organization only has
one employee, the survey should be designed in a way that the employee from IT
can remain anonymous.
The questions on employee
engagement surveys are often literal statements where the employees can pick an
option from “Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree or Strongly agree”. Figure
05 shows a sample layout for engagement survey with the rating scheme. The
scale on the sample doesn’t include an option for the responders to select
“Neutral”. It can be argued that the option to respond as “neutral” could help
differentiate a not-engaged employee from an engaged or actively disengaged
person discussed on the previous post of this blog.
Figure
05: Sample Employee Engagement survey.
Source: (Armstrong, 2009).
Figure 06 lists some examples of statements used on
employee engagement surveys by reputed organizations. As seen with the
statements used by Dell Inc., the statements should be simply worded, specific
and relatable for the employee.
Figure
06: Sample questions for Employee Engagement surveys.
Source: (Vance, 2006).
According to Vance (2016), the
below are some of the key areas that the statements/questions on an engagement
survey should cover:
1.
Pride
in employer
2.
Satisfaction
with employer
3.
Job
satisfaction
4.
Opportunity
to perform well at challenging work
5.
Recognition
and positive feedback for one’s contributions
6.
Personal
support from one’s supervisor
7.
Effort
above and beyond the minimum
8.
Understanding
the link between one’s job and the organization’s mission
9.
Prospects
for future growth with one’s employer
10. Intention to stay with
one’s employer
Due to their simplicity and
effectiveness, many organizations chose surveys as their method of gauging
employee engagement. Other means such as focus groups and one-on-one interviews
would also be helpful in measuring employee engagement and diagnosing related
issues (Armstrong, 2009).
At my current workplace, a
bi-annual survey is shared with all employees. The survey has most of the
characteristics discussed on this post. The HR team of the organization also
conducts interviews with focus groups. The management team most of the time
uses the feedback received via surveys and discussions to make sure that
necessary adjustments are made on the company’s HR strategies & other
policies/procedures. These practices have helped the organization get
recognized as one of the best places to work in Sri Lanka in 2019, by Great
Place to Work Sri Lanka ® Institute.
Bonus fact: Interesting point to note is that carrying out employee
engagement surveys itself could also enhance employee engagement. This is
because, by asking for employees’ opinions/feedback and then implementing
strategies based on those survey results, the organization conveys the message
to its employees that their input is respected (Vance, 2006).
References:
Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management
practice. 11th ed. London: Kogan Page, P. 1019.
Robinson, D., Perryman, S. and Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee
Engagement. 1st ed. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies, pp.13-20.
Vance, R. J. (2006) Employee Engagement and Commitment. [Online]
Available at: https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-reports-and-expert-views/Documents/Employee-Engagement-Commitment.pdf
[Accessed 01 October 2019].
Well explained.moreover, according to the Vance (2006) Job and task design, Recruitment, Selection, Training, Compensation, Performance management and Career development. will affect employees’ level of engagements
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment! At my current workplace we have a saying "we don't hire & promote for qualifications, we hire & promote for the values of the person". Hence I agree that recruitment & selection, compensation, performance management are critical aspects of employee engagement.
DeleteYou have figured out and well-structured your explanation on the topic “measuring employee engagement”. Adding more to your valued explanation, there are 3 ways of measuring the employee engagement in terms of individual needs, team orientation and professional growth (Gleeson, 2018).
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment! I would agree that there are many different directions in which the measuring employee engagement could be done however, the 10 key areas covered by Vance (2016) provides a comprehensive listing. An employer may chose to include more questions on their employee engagement questionnaires, on certain elements they want to specifically focus on.
DeleteI agree with your detailed description. Further, engagement rates vary by age, occupation, gender, level of seniority, remote from location on-site, level of education, region, country, and state. Where companies may determine levels of engagement at a granular level (e.g., business unit or division, or staff or team leader) then there is a clearer picture of the group's relative performance against their peers. Only when these data are short-term or even long-term predictive does employee engagement data have any real value (Ray, Phillips and Phillips, 2016).
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment, Anjula! While I agree that the factors listed above can influence the engagement levels of an employee, I also believe an organization should have HR practices that makes sure that an employees age, race, gender and seniority do not play a role in how the employee is treated in the organization. As discussed on my blog post, it's crucial that an employee engagement survey captures those factors so that the responses can be analyzed in order to diagnose any issues (Robinson et al., 2004).
DeleteI dmire your enthusiasm over this subject Nadeeranga. I would like to mention that measuring the employee engagement has it's own perks to an organization. Attridge (2009) states that by measuring the employee engagement can be seful to the organization so it can reduce the staff turnover, enhance the working environment and finally a successful business outcome.
ReplyDeleteHi Shan, thank you for your comment, appreciate the viewpoints you have added from Attridge (2009). I agree, by diagnosing the issues early via engagement surveys and various other tools, organizations have the opportunity to implement corrective action plans and turn things around swiftly.
DeleteAccording to Robinson (2006), employee engagement can be achieved through the creation of an organisational environment where positive emotions such as involvement and pride are encouraged, resulting in improved organisational performance, lower employee turnover and better health.
ReplyDeleteAgreed Sharon, I have explored this topic in detail on my post on "Strategies for Increasing Employee Engagement Level". Creating a learning culture is an important aspect in nurturing employee engagement. Discretionary learning instead of obligatory (often unproductive) training programs should be encouraged – this process takes place when employees truly are interested in acquiring the skills and knowledge that are needed to support the organization’s mission (Sloman, 2003 Cited in Armstrong, 2009)
DeleteGood Post! Employee engagement activities have been proven to improve productivity, and overall improve remote employees team bonding in the workplace. Bring your remote team together through Online employee engagement activities.
ReplyDeleteEngaged employees care for the company, they’re not simply working for salary and promotions but they also work effectively and efficiently for the growth of the company. Online employee engagement activities have become the most popular topic for leaders and HR professionals, because of the pandemic conditions. Filled with unique fun virtual entertaining games that help employees connect with others
ReplyDeleteEmployee engagement plays an important role in the team-building process in the organization, it is more crucial when employees are working remotely. Virtual team building company in US help organizations and companies to create positive and meaningful employee engagement events to boost employees bonding.
ReplyDeleteLooking for engaging activities to do with your employees? Check out our Employee Engagement Activities Calendar! We have a wide range of activities, from team building exercises to fun social outings, that will get your employees interacting and having a great time.
ReplyDelete